Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 15:39:53 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Will Saxon <WillS@housing.ufl.edu> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Solution for Resilient VLAN Trunk Bonding Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403081539230.51038-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED802E867D7@bragi.housing.ufl.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Will Saxon wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: eberkut [mailto:eberkut@minithins.net] > > Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 3:57 PM > > To: Jacob S. Barrett > > Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: Solution for Resilient VLAN Trunk Bonding > > > > > > > I would have liked to have used either ng_fec or > > ng_one2many, but neither > > > of them detects link failures. > > > > According to the original ng_fec announcement [1] on > > freebsd-net, ng_fec > > should be able to detect link failure by checking the > > interfaces in the > > bundle once every second. > > > > Even though I don't "speak" C fluently, I think ng_fec_tick > > in ng_fec.c > > [2] should do the trick. > > > > [1] > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=448009+0+archive/ > > 2001/freebsd-net/20010211.freebsd-net > > [2] http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/netgraph/ng_fec.c > > Regardless, it doesn't look like ng_fec can work with ng_vlan, since > it doesn't provide any hooks to work with. > It could be rewritten to be a real netgraph node but I don't have teh time to do it.. > -Will > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0403081539230.51038-100000>