Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 04:45:01 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@hub.freebsd.org> To: Dirk Froemberg <dirk@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/secure/usr.bin Makefile src/secure/usr.bin/openssl Makefile Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.9912290441460.96581-100000@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <19991229004713.A9128@physik.TU-Berlin.DE>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 29 Dec 1999, Dirk Froemberg wrote:
> Works fine for me.
Glad to hear it.
> But what about the openssl port and the ports depending on/using the
> openssl port, now?
>
> Will this be merged into RELENG_3? If not we'll have to surround
> dependecies to openssl by something like
>
> .if !exists(/usr/lib/libcrypto.so) || !exists(/usr/lib/libssl.so)
> LIB_DEPENDS= crypto.1:${PORTSDIR}/security/openssl
Hmm. I have no immediate plans to MFC because it's not something we've
discussed, but I don't see any reason why it couldn't be once everything
is stabilized. Does LIB_DEPENDS pick up libraries in /usr/lib? If not,
that would probably be the best way out of this: in the 4.0 case the
dependency would always succeed and the port would never be built.
Kris
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.9912290441460.96581-100000>