Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:43:33 -0500 (EST) From: <atrens@nortel.ca> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "Atrens, Andrew [SKY:ET95:EXCH]" <atrens@americasm01.nt.com>, <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: possibly related data point - (was) Re: Current Broken! Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0012081205110.75644-100000@hcarp00g.ca.nortel.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.001208092345.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I hit on it by accident (I normally compile with -O). That said, your
claim that gcc with no optimization generates incorrect code is
kind of counter-intuitive, wouldn't you say ?
I think you missed my point, I was just illustrating that optimizer seems
to affect (in my case apparently negate) the processing of constraints.
What you take from that is up to you - I was just trying to be helpful :)
Cheers,
A.
+--
| Andrew Atrens Nortel Networks, Ottawa, Canada. |
| All opinions expressed are my own, not those of any employer. |
--+
Berkeley had what we called "copycenter", which is "take it down
to the copy center and make as many copies as you want".
-- Kirk McKusick
+-- --+
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.30.0012081205110.75644-100000>