Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 Apr 2001 16:15:30 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Chet Hosey <chosey@nidhog.com>
To:        <FreeBSD-ISP@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Chasing the kiddies (was: Named Keep crashing)
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.31.0104041612470.45811-100000@web1.nidhog.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010404145617.B879@laptop.os2warp.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Do you assume that all port scans are malicious? Is there a situation in
which a scan would not cause you make such a call?

________________________________________________________________________

Chet Hosey
<chosey@nidhog.com>
________________________________________________________________________

On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Scott Lambert wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 01:16:19PM -0600, Forrest W. Christian wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 13:16:19 -0600 (MDT)
> > From: "Forrest W. Christian" <forrestc@imach.com>
> > To: Kal Torak <kaltorak@quake.com.au>
> > Cc: Enno Davids <enno.davids@metva.com.au>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
> > Subject: Re: Chasing the kiddies (was: Named Keep crashing)
> >
> > On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Kal Torak wrote:
> >
> > > Why should network scanning be a crime at all? If anything should be a crime
> > > its sloppy admins that let there networks get comprimised...
> >
> > But when after you scan, you break in and destroy data, THAT should be the
> > crime I'm talking about.
> >
> > What you don't realize is that a lot of these attacks are now automated
> > rootkits which basically scan for the hole and if they find it, ROOT YOUR
> > MACHINE.
> >
> > This is wrong.
>
> These people who don't think scanning is a problem bother me.  I don't have
> time to hunt down all the scanning kiddies, but I don't like them.  I do
> hunt down the ones I get complaints on.
>
> Scanning a network is just like "casing" a neighborhood in my book.  The
> police will stop you and check your background and want to know if you
> have any business in the area if someone reports you to them.  The police
> call it suspicious behaviour which gives them probable cause to stop the
> bad guy.  They get what information they can from him and if he is not
> (yet) wanted they let him go.  But they watch him.  They remember he was
> in the area and if any complaints do come in they go grab him first.
>
> I do the same thing with my scanning kiddies.  My kiddies who go scanning
> my network or other people's networks get a phone call.  I talk to their
> parents and tell them their kids are on the wrong road and could wind up
> in jail if they ever open one of those doors.  Hopefully the parents can
> straighten the kids out.  I hope the kids tell the other kids that they
> got busted.  It lets them know they can get in trouble for it and will
> hopefully discourage them.
>
> I just wish I could go visit them physically so I could make certain they
> were scared before I let them go.
>
> Entering a computer system is breaking and entering.  Send them to jail.
> It doesn't matter if they immediately left without doing anything.  If anyone
> enters my home through a window I have left open for ventilation at night,
> they could very possibly be shot or bludgeoned about the head and shoulders
> by a baseball bat or whatever other blunt or sharp object I find first.
> They will most likely end up in jail.  It makes no difference that the
> window was open.  You just don't cross those lines.
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.31.0104041612470.45811-100000>