Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 13:11:50 -0300 (ADT) From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.ORG>, <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Imagemagick doesn't know about freetype2 ... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0104091311120.72136-100000@mobile.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <3AD1DA69.41F7B257@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Ade Lovett wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 01:17:37AM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > > > > > > subject pretty much says it all ... even though its a dependancy? > > > > This is a known problem. XFree86 4.mumble, in it's infinite wisdom, > > includes freetype2 (it used to be worse - only bits of it), however, > > the current incantation misses out the rather useful 'freetype-config' > > script. > > > > Adding -I${X11BASE}/include/freetype2 to the CONFIGURE_ENV line in > > the Makefile is one way around it. > > > > The other is to clean up the whole freetype2/XFree86-4 mess. > > Unfortunately jmz doesn't show any willingness to do a messcleaning, so > 4.3 is likely to be shipped with this nasty bug. :-( Okay, I might be missing something, but why is shipping freetype2 with XFree86 a bad thing? Just cause it doesn't do the freetype-config script? If so, can't it be added to the port itself? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.33.0104091311120.72136-100000>