Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 14:53:48 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> To: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> Cc: John Utz <john@utzweb.net>, <mobile@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Sprint PCS / AirCard 510 on newcard Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0111121451100.35390-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu> In-Reply-To: <200111111912.fABJCi774306@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 11 Nov 2001, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <Pine.LNX.4.33.0111110153510.26863-100000@jupiter.linuxengine.net> John Utz writes: > : given the mail that doug sent out earlier today, there is some unhappiness > : in the cis parsing code that doesnt permit us to see all of the cises? > : cisii? :-) correctly. > : > : Tuple #2, code = 0x6 (Long link to next chain for MFC), length = 11 > : > : i am guessing the stuff about Long link is referring to the problem, but i > : really dunno yet. > > This likely is a cause of problems. The OLDCARD pccard cis parsing > code isn't very good about these. Yeah -- it completely ignores them. jmg and I did hack (and I mean *hack*) it to "resolve" these links by merging them back with the main CIS tuple list, but there's still something up with the resource handling.. i can get sio4 to attach to it, but opening the port hangs the machine. I still need to verify if our code is writing the resources to the right part of the CIS (the doubled bytes make it tricky to calculate addresses :-) ) ... Warner, do you know if you need any special pccard bridge magic to allocage resources for different functions, or is it sufficient to just write the values back into the appropriate CIS segment? Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.33.0111121451100.35390-100000>