Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 May 2004 14:33:27 +0000 (UTC)
From:      "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
To:        =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@DeepCore.dk>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=21267353
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.53.0405121431040.66978@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net>
In-Reply-To: <40A21BF1.4080502@DeepCore.dk>
References:  <20040512145212.62e7db1e@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> <40A21BF1.4080502@DeepCore.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 12 May 2004, S=F8ren Schmidt wrote:

Hi,

> Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
>
> > Could someone tell me what this means (-CURRENT)?
>
> The WRITE operation was signalled done by the disk by issueing an
> interrupt and the finished request was put on a taskqueue to have it
> return status to the system. However the timeout code fired because the
> taskqueue hadn't been executed yet (it will wait one ome timeout period
> before the result is forced through)..
>
> So there is no harm done, but the taskqueue was slow to respond...

as postend to freebsd-amd64 I am getting far too many of those and
they won't stop.

 From time to time there is also
ad10: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but taskqueue stalled LBA=3D..=
=2E
between all the ${subject} lines.

The only thing how I can stop this is a hard reset of the machine.

--=20
Bjoern A. Zeeb=09=09=09=09bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
56 69 73 69 74=09=09=09=09http://www.zabbadoz.net/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.53.0405121431040.66978>