Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 2 Sep 1995 11:28:34 +0800 (CST)
From:      Brian Tao <taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw>
To:        FreeBSD hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>
Subject:   Re: 16-bit pids? (was Re: 16, 32, and 64bit types?)
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSI.3.91.950902112102.25712B-100000@aries>
In-Reply-To: <199509011645.SAA16004@uriah.heep.sax.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 1 Sep 1995, J Wunsch wrote:
> 
> After a PID rollover, the non-uniqueness of the PID namespace can fool
> this mechanism.

    Ah ha, I see now, *ding*.  :)  Yeah, it does seem a little
short-sighted, now that you mention it.  ;-)  pid_t is a long, but
PID_MAX is 30000?  Are those other 17 bits used for anything at all?
-- 
Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao
taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.91.950902112102.25712B-100000>