Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2000 13:22:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Fotis Georgatos <fotis@ripe.net> To: Konstantin Chuguev <Konstantin.Chuguev@dante.org.uk> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Periodic scripts [Was: Re: /etc/security -> /etc/periodic/security ?] Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.05L.10006301309170.24628-100000@x21.ripe.net> In-Reply-To: <395B79A0.AB99EA21@dante.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello all, > > Will we be seeing a move in this direction towards a more configurable > > security script? Is anyone planning it? What about a configuration language? On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Konstantin Chuguev wrote: > IMO, introducing a sort of silent mode to these periodic scripts would help > sysadmins. The idea is as follows: [...] I've been using the tool Cfengine lately, and I am surprised that it's not more standard in the BSD family (++). Why bother with complex shell scripts when you can have most needed functionality in a single C program? I've found myself replacing 10-20 lines of shell code with a single line. Remember that shell scripts involve all shorts of small utilities, and have to fork and play with memory space quite much, many times. I'd like to hear other people's ideas on this, because I'm in an effort to replace them anyway... Please, keep me cc. cheers, Fotis -- The statistician drowned in a lake averaging only 2 feet in depth. Fotis Georgatos <fotis@ripe.net>, nic-hdl: FMG21-RIPE To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.4.05L.10006301309170.24628-100000>