Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 00:04:33 -0500 (EST) From: Kenneth Wayne Culver <culverk@wam.umd.edu> To: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: So we're stuck with using timidity now? Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95q.981228000206.24007A-100000@rac1.wam.umd.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.96.981227173848.13827C-100000@hp9000.chc-chimes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Like I said before... Just use OSS/FreeBSD... It is better than VoxWare > > anyway. And with some talking to Dev at 4-front tech, I'm sure an > > agreement could be made. > > OSS is better. Better at panicing my system. Lets use the homegrown > solutions before we start implementing a _known_ buggy module. Are you using the newest OSS? Also, Dev at 4-front tech has told me that the problem with his software panicing the kernel is because of problems with FreeBSD's virtual memory system. So do we need to fix that, or do we need to make Dev find a non-existant workaround (he has already looked for one)?? Kenneth Culver To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.95q.981228000206.24007A-100000>