Date: Sun, 12 Oct 1997 20:15:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek <hoek@hwcn.org> To: Alex <garbanzo@hooked.net> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fnord0: disabled, not probed. Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.971012200713.14368A-100000@james.freenet.hamilton.on.ca> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971012155131.13795A-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 12 Oct 1997, Alex wrote:
> What changing it to
>
> #ifdef VERBOSE_PROBES
> printf("fnord0: disabled, not probed.\n");
> #else
> if (bootverbose)
> printf("fnord0: disabled, not probed.\n");
> #endif
>
> so that you could get either behavior, depending on your taste?
So people who don't compile their own kernels (ie. the people
affected by jkh's change) get to choose? :)
--
Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never!
tIM...HOEk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.96.971012200713.14368A-100000>