Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 18:26:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Marc Slemko <marcs@znep.com> To: lcremean@tidalwave.net Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PC Magazine 10/20/1998 Article about FreeBSD Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.02A.9810081826030.15278-100000@redfish> In-Reply-To: <19981008211843.A3259@tidalwave.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 8 Oct 1998, Lee Cremeans wrote: > On Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 04:16:46PM -0700, Reginald Perry wrote: > > The answer seems to be that the statement about the cache is incorrect, but > > that there seems to be a bottleneck somewhere, but 1) its unclear where, 2) > > its unclear that its a problem. > > I read that article, and that statement about cache just seems to be a total > non-sequitur. It flies right in the face of the graph they gave, and the It is completely consistent with the graph. The graph is clients vs. ops with _one_ amount of RAM. They are saying that with an increasing amount of RAM, NT gets more gains. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.02A.9810081826030.15278-100000>