Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 19:23:40 -0800 (PST) From: Kip Macy <kmacy@netapp.com> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> Cc: dfr@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: to users of threads (GDB support) Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10202111919090.7921-100000@cranford> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10202112033290.12963-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > There's no reason freebsd-uthread.c has to be included in gdb. I think that there are instances when an individual wants to use the latest and greatest version of GDB and still have thread support. Even if the threads library does change, the objfile function should be able to take that into account. > That said, I think dfr and I are the only ones that have > done anything with freebsd-uthread.c, aside from obrien. > My papers are on file with FSF. I don't know about dfr. dfr is your paperwork on file? -Kip To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10202111919090.7921-100000>