Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 10:13:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is MySQL nearly twice as fast on Linux? Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10405241010540.1932-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <40B19F2E.8010804@he.iki.fi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 24 May 2004, Petri Helenius wrote: > Thomas Hurst wrote: > > > > >Only if you're only using one table. While this is true in this > >benchmark, it isn't really relevent because we're only testing selects, > >which are pure reads. There should be no table locking getting in the > >way; Linux's performance would seem to confirm this. > > > > I changed the test to use InnoDB table type and saw 50% performance > improvement. Are you able to run the test using InnoDB under Linux also (just to see if Linux also gets a ~50% improvement)? What did you do to change the test (got a diff)? -- Dan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10405241010540.1932-100000>