Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:25:02 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MFC of bump in libcom_err.so another mistake? Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0601312122360.4643-100000@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <7B0411F5-FCBC-40BC-94CA-2B8AA13FA783@mcneil.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Sean McNeil wrote: > > The point I am making is that this is in the -STABLE tree, not the - > CURRENT tree. There is no bump of libc and I don't see any reason > for the libcom_err.so revision bump in -STABLE. IMHO, it didn't make > sense. I don't think it was -stable at the time. It was probably 6.0-current and the version bump occurred just before the release. As a -current user, you are expected to be able to deal with this and rebuild all your ports if necessary. -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.43.0601312122360.4643-100000>