Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 14:47:24 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org, ume@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsync doesn't work simply on 7-current with SYMVER_ENABLED=yes Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0612021441110.10127@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <20061203010732.7a371b62.nork@FreeBSD.org> References: <20061130003939.7d05b09a.nork@FreeBSD.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0611291302190.22399@sea.ntplx.net> <20061203010732.7a371b62.nork@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:14:41 -0500 (EST) > Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> wrote: >> I don't understand why kqueue and kevent are not found in cvsync, >> but still end up being referenced: > > cvsync doesn't use kqueue/kevent. Maybe these are used by > resolver in libc. > > I discussed with ume@. He suggested following patch. > I confirmed improvement. But... (Please see also attached > ktrace result). > > ume@ said that I don't know it is right. Old resolver codes > and RPC didn't use _kqueue. In fact, there are some kqueue > in some libc codes. Yes, I saw them (see my previous email from a few days ago)... Are you using cached? You have to change all kevent()'s in net/nscachedcli.c to _kevent(). -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.0612021441110.10127>