Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:05:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: Desmond da Peoples <que_deseja@hotmail.com> Cc: tevans.uk@googlemail.com, anton@hesiod.org, "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: gpart is junk Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.1209270942000.4511@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <BAY167-W132A828DEE55B76CE0C343AED9C0@phx.gbl> References: <20120916120041.391C41065680@hub.freebsd.org>, <505624A9.7040508@hesiod.org>, <CAFHbX1KjLHCHste9H4sV_kwxWT25uRHo%2BoLeL3R4xev=oR8LaQ@mail.gmail.com>, <Pine.GSO.4.64.1209170852200.17927@sea.ntplx.net> <BAY167-W132A828DEE55B76CE0C343AED9C0@phx.gbl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012, Desmond da Peoples wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > > On Mon, 17 Sep 2012, Tom Evans wrote: > > > >> On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 8:12 PM, Jeff Anton <anton@hesiod.org> wrote: > >>> ^E my point is that all this information needs to be > >>> together in one human and machine readable form. We need to be able to look > >>> at the whole picture of a device and say "that makes sense" then do it. And > >>> this shouldn't be from some GUI junk either. > >>> In a file, this information can be kept as a reference, as a confirmation > >>> that partitioning hasn't changed unexpectedly, and > >>> modified if needed in a clear manner. > >>> > >> > >> (Sorry to pick at just parts of your email^E) > >> > >> The current GEOM configuration is available from a sysctl in machine > >> readable format - check out kern.geom.confxml. If you are concerned kern.geom.confxml is far from readable. kern.geom.conftxt is closer, but still not anywhere as readable as bsdlabel. > >> about your partitions changing underneath you, storing and then > >> comparing output from this sysctl gives you a simple way to determine > >> what. > >> > >> A human readable version can be obtained from the gpart tool. > >> > >> IMHO, gpart and GEOM are fantastic. gpart is a much simpler tool to > >> use than fdisk, and fully understands every kind of disk partitioning > >> you can throw at it, whilst fdisk is only a tool for playing with MBR. > >> The gpart man page explains clearly and concisely how to use it. > >> > >> GEOM provides a clear framework that anything can plug in to, from > >> labels to whole disk encryption. > > > > It is not simple. All I want is Solaris format utility (partition > > and label). > > For someone such as myself- and others- who use PowerPC(64)/POWER > systems, gpart is far from being junk. Fdisk is basically useless > on an APM table or to even create such. You also have the choice > of creating a partition scheme with a Linux live CD and then > adjusting the partition types with gpart. You can use gparted. > Maybe you haven't noticed that gpart givess you the option of > different partition tables from the start. gpart is a low-level tool to be used by someone who knows exactly what they are doing. It is not useful for someone who just wants to partition and label a disk and doesn't have hours of free time to read and understand gpart. I want the capability of the old installer. Where is that? Ahh, I found it - I guess it is /usr/sbin/bsdinstall :-) -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.1209270942000.4511>