Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 03:48:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Ben Black <black@zen.cypher.net> To: "Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com" <michaelv@MindBender.serv.net> Cc: Mr M P Searle <csubl@csv.warwick.ac.uk>, smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quad Pro 150 motherboard? Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970428034725.32065W-100000@zen.cypher.net> In-Reply-To: <199704280743.AAA26201@MindBender.serv.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 28 Apr 1997, Michael L. VanLoon -- HeadCandy.com wrote: > > >a 4 or 6 CPU P6 board for *other* than a large server...think about that > >for a few minutes. > > > >(hint: NT4 Workstation can't handle more than 2CPUs and that is the most > >popular commercial SMP-capable OS) > > Bullshit. > perhaps you'd like to clarify. NT *server* can handle more CPUs, but NT *workstation* is limited to 2. if you have a microsoft URL i can peruse to dispute that, i'd be happy to admit my mistake. but i doubt you can provide such a thing. b3n
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.3.91.970428034725.32065W-100000>