Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 09:13:33 +0200 (MET DST) From: Reinoud <Reinoud.Koornstra@ibb.net> To: Gerhard Sittig <Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipf or ipfw (was: log with dynamic firewall rules) Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.1000727090741.8649B-100000@ux1.ibb.net> In-Reply-To: <20000726191113.I24476@speedy.gsinet>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 26 Jul 2000, Gerhard Sittig wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 21:56 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > > > Would running both ipfw and ipf be considered over the top? > > I was never sure whether they collide or not. But having ipf > running I don't see a point in using ipfw. Make sure you have > There can be one reason to run ipfw and ipf together. I just use ipf as firewall, and started using ipfw cause dummynet can only be used when you're using ipfw as far as i can tell. So ipf is still used (and will always be :) ) as ip filter on the machines, and ipfw is used just to make dummynet work to control bandwidth. Bye, Reinoud. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.3.95.1000727090741.8649B-100000>