Date: Sun, 3 Aug 1997 17:03:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex <garbanzo@hooked.net> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Some thoughts and ideas, and quirks Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970803170217.1341C-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org> In-Reply-To: <199708032130.OAA02371@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 3 Aug 1997, Terry Lambert wrote: > Personally, I would prefer to make all configuration runtime with > demand-loaded kernel modules. > > It is my considered opinion that *any* user driven kernel > configuration (text file *or* menu based) is antiquated > baloney. > > So you can guess that I'm not really a fan of replacing one type > of baloney with another type of baloney, regardless of it's > pedigree. > That brings me to another thought or 5 ;) . What about an rc.modules? Also, some things are lacking, like for instance it appears to me that you don't need to statically compile ccd or ppp devices. However the uid filesystem thing does need to be statically compiled as does ext2, both typos in the lint, and man pages, etc. - alex
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.3.95.970803170217.1341C-100000>