Date: Mon, 16 Mar 1998 02:03:32 -0500 (EST) From: Yarema <yds@paris.dppl.com> To: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sendmail going commercial, and ? Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980316015824.2374B-100000@paris.dppl.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980314120041.294B-100000@dumbwinter.logic.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 14 Mar 1998, Marco Molteni wrote: > On Fri, 13 Mar 1998, Yarema wrote: > > > Qmail has performed quite well for me. [..] > I totally agree. I like qmail _and_ it's configuration system ;-) > > Yarema, > please quote me right: <.....> Sorry, it was Outlook Express' fault. That program just don't know how to quote properly. I certainly didn't mean to misrepresent what you said. On the other hand I can also see why some people might not like qmail and its author. And Exim is a very capable MTA alternative to both sendmail and qmail. Although Exim does not claim delivery rates as high as qmail's it utilizes many of the same reliability, security and performance techniques as qmail. In any case just about anything's better than sendmail. It's unfortunate that SysAdmins continue to suffer sendmail mostly due to tradition and, very likely, licensing issues. Although zmailer might be very good, exim is available *now* with tcpd and anti-spam functionality all built into one program. -- Yarema To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.3.96.980316015824.2374B-100000>