Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 19:03:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Alex Belits <abelits@phobos.illtel.denver.co.us> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: jlemon@americantv.com, jooji@webnology.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Producing non-GPLed tools for FreeBSD Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.02A.9810211900420.19006-100000@phobos.illtel.denver.co.us> In-Reply-To: <199810220141.SAA12492@usr01.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 22 Oct 1998, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > So you could argue that the GPL is just another form of an NDA. > > > > I don't want to know, what do you smoke, but please, explain, what kind > > of disclosure of the GPL'ed source is prohibited by GPL? > > Disclosure of binaries without source code. 8-). *Lack* of disclosure of the source code with binaries disclosure is prohibited, not the disclosure itself. Just lack of attribution in the case of BSD license. -- Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.02A.9810211900420.19006-100000>