Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Jan 1999 12:43:02 -0800 (PST)
From:      Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
To:        David Wolfskill <dhw@whistle.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Error in vm_fault change
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.4.04.9901261240530.20486-100000@feral-gw>
In-Reply-To: <199901262036.MAA08253@pau-amma.whistle.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

It would be a good thing to add knobs back in to try and give some control
over interactive vs. single task throughput performance.

Lacking knobs, configuration options would be good.


> >From: Robert Watson <robert@cyrus.watson.org>
> 
> >I.e., today it's a realtime machine, tomorrow it's a single-user
> >workstation, the next day a heavily loaded timesharing machine with CPU
> >time partitioning.
> 
> I can see a value to this ability....
> 
> Back when I was an MVS (IBM mainframe) systems programmer, it wasn't
> uncommon for a machine to be set up to have differing SRM (? "System
> Resource Manager" seems to strike a resonant chord in my memory)
> "objective curves" depending on the expected workload, which would often
> vary depending on time-of-day:  for example, during the day, the system
> would be weighted to favor interactive processes, while at night, it
> would switch to more of a batch mode of operation (for back-office
> file-crunching).
> 
> Although the range of work handled reasonably adequately by modern UNIX
> systems is pretty awesome, the ability to favor one type of workload
> over another can give a sysadmin another "knob" to twist -- and it may
> merely be used more on a per-site basis than on a time-of-day basis, but
> it would be rather silly to assume that everyone's workload is the same.
> 
> The boxes I'm responsible for here, for example, aren't under the kind
> of load (qualitatively or quantitatively) that the shellN boxes at BEST
> (Hi, Matt!) are, for example.  (I consider this A Good Thing.)  And the
> workload of one box may well differ from that of another; this is
> intentional.
> 
> david
> -- 
> David Wolfskill		UNIX System Administrator
> dhw@whistle.com		voice: (650) 577-7158	pager: (650) 371-4621
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.04.9901261240530.20486-100000>