Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 23:30:48 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: Dru Nelson <dnelson@redwoodsoft.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: softupdates Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.04.9902122328170.21631-100000@feral-gw> In-Reply-To: <199902121921.LAA06904@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> :-matt > > If you need absolute reliability, I would seriously consider a NetApp. > I'd choose that over everything - solaris, irix, *bsd, linux, NT. You > name it. They're even less open than Microsoft. A newer Novell. And I know whereof of what I speak- I worked with a large chunk of these folks either at Auspex or Sun. There are two factors being pursued- one is service goals, and the other is research/development/tech-transfer. If the former goal was the only one, *BSD/Linux would not be considered as it isn't a warrantable item. -matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.04.9902122328170.21631-100000>