Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 Dec 1998 23:56:03 +0100 (MET)
From:      Sascha Schumann <sas@schell.de>
To:        Martin Husemann <martin@rumolt.teuto.de>
Cc:        =?iso-8859-1?Q?Markus_D=F6hr?= <doehrm@aubi.de>, hm@hcs.de, freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Support for ITK? (Comment)
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.4.05.9812092347100.19792-100000@guerilla.foo.bar>
In-Reply-To: <199812092126.WAA04760@rumolt.teuto.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 9 Dec 1998, Martin Husemann wrote:

> > IMHO I think, that writing a driver for this card cannot be so difficult,
> > because the source for the driver is available on Linux and can IMHO be
> > adapted to *BSD,
> 
> Writing any driver for any card is "not so difficult". There are even cards
> with good documentation waiting for someone to finish a driver (my daic driver
> for old active Diehl/Eicon cards is a good example).
> 
> There is no benefit per se to support any card. We are not fighting a battle
> against I4L to support more cards then they do - we would have lost that
> battle from the start. And we don't even fight a battle "our drivers are
> better written than your's are" - although at least to me this is a quite
> apealing challenge (and we would have won that from the start!).

Can you exaggerate on your last sentence? I see I4L as a feature rich,
stable and mature implementation of something which is used by many
people. There is no point in saying ``We are the best, so we didn't bother
to compete at first''.

The closed development of i4b is something I never understood - the last
public version is about 5 months old.

> So this one is easy: send one card to me, one to Hellmuth (or any other I4B
> developer voluntering) and promise not to urge us. Maybe you could even ask
> ITK for official docs. And maybe you will get a working driver back - and
> maybe only your cards and no driver.
> 
> Yoy see, everyone I know able to write such a driver has *a lot of* various
> working and supported cards around - why should he even consider looking at
> the I4L driver? How should he then start testing a driver?

Yes, it would be much easier to switch to I4L in such a case. :-P

          Regards,
						                                
                            Sascha Schumann | 
                                 Consultant | finger sas@schell.de
                                            | for PGP public key


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.05.9812092347100.19792-100000>