Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 09:26:48 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Eldridge <diz@cafes.net> To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lynx test / 2nd attempt Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10012070915350.11294-100000@mail.cafes.net> In-Reply-To: <E143ysW-0004Am-00@post.mail.nl.demon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000 wkb@freebie.demon.nl wrote: > > > On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Mike Smith wrote: > > > > Zero, without access to SRM sources. > > > > > > Gee, Mike, that's quite a lashing tongue you have. :) > > > > > > What's to stop anyone from writing their own SRM? Reverse engineering? > > > Is it against the license? Does SRM even have a license? > > > > It's one of those "if you have to ask" questions, really. > > Absolutely ;) SRM is a closely guarded secret even within DEC/CPQ. > And yes, it is licensed. Even if you had the source code you would have > to use VMS to build the code 8) Figures. :) On the bright side, if you had the source, a local community college here still runs VMS on VAX. There are DEC vt100, vt220, vt300, vt320, and vt400 terminals all over the campus. It's neat, amusing, and sad all at the same time. Mike ----------------------------------------------------- Save the whales. Feed the hungry. Free the mallocs. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.10.10012070915350.11294-100000>