Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 01:48:06 +0000 (GMT) From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> Cc: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>, Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net>, "current @ freebsd . org" <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Kernel preemption, yes or no? (was: Filesystem gets a huge performance boost) Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0104180143210.14364-100000@www.everquick.net> In-Reply-To: <20010417182840.A976@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 18:28:40 -0700 > From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> > > 1) interrupts are again fan-in, meaning if you block an interrupt > class on one cpu you block them on all cpus When would this be a bad case? i.e., if an interrupt [class] must be blocked, would we not it blocked across the board? Eddy --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. EverQuick Internet / EternalCommerce Division Phone: (316) 794-8922 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.20.0104180143210.14364-100000>