Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 15:54:37 -0600 (MDT) From: Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov> To: FengYue <fengyue@bluerose.windmoon.nu> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: anonymous memory map vs mmap on /dev/zero Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010041553430.6560-100000@mini.acl.lanl.gov> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10010041412130.9343-100000@bluerose.windmoon.nu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 4 Oct 2000, FengYue wrote: > It seems that mmap on /dev/zero is more portable. no really, It won't work at all correctly on linux, and on Tru64 it does the totally wrong thing, but the (fd = -1, MAP_ANONYMOUS) does the right thing on tru64. It's disappointing that this works so unportably :-( ron To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.21.0010041553430.6560-100000>