Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:51:31 +1200 (NZST) From: Juha Saarinen <juha@saarinen.org> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com> Cc: "mixtim@home.com" <mixtim@home.com>, "rjackson@cs.csubak.edu" <rjackson@cs.csubak.edu>, "stable@FreeBSD.ORG" <stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable anymore? Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106121049560.5609-100000@vimfuego.saarinen.org> In-Reply-To: <20010611153217J.jkh@osd.bsdi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > Finally, let's not forget that nobody is FORCING you to run -stable. > In fact, users in your category are always recommended to stick with > the releases and not upgrade until a new one comes out so I'm not > even sure why we're having this conversation in the first place. I'm confused about this. The Handbook says to track -STABLE, if errr... you want stability. Are you saying that in order to have a stable system, we should stick with -RELEASE? Maybe remove the -STABLE branch then? -- Regards, Juha PGP fingerprint: B7E1 CC52 5FCA 9756 B502 10C8 4CD8 B066 12F3 9544 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.33.0106121049560.5609-100000>