Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 12 Oct 2004 18:43:55 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To:        Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
Cc:        Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
Subject:   Re: Email nagging, was: Re: Ports with version numbers goingbackwards: graphics/gd,japanese/gd, ukrain...
Message-ID:  <Pine.LNX.4.44.0410121843030.2317-100000@pancho>
In-Reply-To: <B06C0FC0-1CA6-11D9-A5A5-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:

> Uhm, I wonder why you are fine with hourly `INDEX build failed' 
> messages, but oppose those addressing PORTVERSION. Any crucial 
> difference I'm missing?

N ports vs M ports, N >> M.

mcl




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.44.0410121843030.2317-100000>