Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 09:16:54 +0200 (CEST) From: Petr Salinger <Petr.Salinger@seznam.cz> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: leak of the vnodes Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.1004030915440.17349@sci.felk.cvut.cz> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.1004022337010.16354@sci.felk.cvut.cz> References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.1004021934550.15800@sci.felk.cvut.cz> <20100402190239.GL2415@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <Pine.LNX.4.62.1004022337010.16354@sci.felk.cvut.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Another possible workaround, if you do not need path resolutions in /proc >> or lsof(1), is to set sysctl vfs.vlru_allow_cache_src=1. > > I will test this. Does not help. kern.maxvnodes: 100000 kern.minvnodes: 25000 vfs.vlru_allow_cache_src: 1 vfs.freevnodes: 199 vfs.wantfreevnodes: 25000 vfs.numvnodes: 100038 debug.vnlru_nowhere: 647 Petr
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.62.1004030915440.17349>