Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:18:39 -0800 (PST) From: "Glenn's mailing lists" <lists@cobalt.antimatter.net> To: user <user@dhp.com> Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: most rock solid SATA Raid card for 5.4-RELEASE and 6.0-RELEASE Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0511141417000.13770@cobalt.antimatter.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0511141658490.8180-100000@shell.dhp.com> References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0511141658490.8180-100000@shell.dhp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, user wrote: > > > On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Glenn's mailing lists wrote: > >>> Is there something more "de facto" - something more solid and supported on >>> freebsd than the 2610SA ? >> >> If you're referring to the 21610SA, the aac driver has had support since >> 5.3-RELEASE > > > No, that is the 16-port card, and yes - I see it listed in aac_pci.c - I > am talking about the 2610SA, which is a six port SATA raid card. I don't see that model listed on the adaptec site, do you have a link? -Glenn > > I found a patch for aac_pci.c that adds the identifiers: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2005-July/012828.html > > but I just want to make sure that this is a non-hack way to run this card > in 5.4-RELEASE. > > If the only addition to aac_pci.c is the identifiers, then can I assume > that the 2610SA will be as solid as any other raid card that uses aac > (like dell PERCs) ? > > Any comments at all are appreciated. > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.63.0511141417000.13770>