Date: Sun, 26 May 1996 18:16:40 -0400 (EDT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net> To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org> Cc: scrappy@freefall.freebsd.org, hsu@clinet.fi, freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/403 Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.93.960526181136.2226E-100000@ki.net> In-Reply-To: <199605262208.PAA24432@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 26 May 1996, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > >Synopsis: FreeBSD 1-compiled tcsh, bash and zsh binaries dump on vt102 > > > >State-Changed-From-To: open-closed > >State-Changed-By: scrappy > >State-Changed-When: Sun May 26 14:47:01 PDT 1996 > >State-Changed-Why: > >binary incompatibility problem between FreeBSD 1.x and FreeBSD 2.x > >that recompiling applications under new environment solves > > Don't we care about binary compatibility with 1.x? The PR was a year old this month (May 13th, 1995)...nobody *seemed* to care about it when the PR was reported, which, I think, would have been the time to worry about it as ppl were just switching up from 1.x to 2.x, no? So far, I've found no other reports of a similar nature, and this one dealt with an aspect of the system that merely required a 'make world' to fix...should it be reopened and assigned to someone? :( Marc G. Fournier scrappy@ki.net Systems Administrator @ ki.net scrappy@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.93.960526181136.2226E-100000>