Date: Sat, 2 Aug 1997 15:10:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Curt Sampson <cjs@portal.ca> To: Tony Overfield <tony@dell.com> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd@atipa.com>, Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Pentium II? Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.93.970802150916.3969K-100000@gnostic.cynic.net> In-Reply-To: <3.0.2.32.19970802024954.006dfb1c@bugs.us.dell.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 2 Aug 1997, Tony Overfield wrote: > Since the hit rate of the L1 cache is usually much higher than that of the L2 > cache, the effect of the slower L2 cache in the Pentium II is usually offset > by the beneficial effect of not having to access it. So even at the same > clock rate, the Pentium II can run faster than the Pentium Pro. Do you have any benchmarks that indicate this? Or are you just dreaming? cjs Curt Sampson cjs@portal.ca Info at http://www.portal.ca/ Internet Portal Services, Inc. `And malt does more than Milton can Vancouver, BC (604) 257-9400 To justify God's ways to man.'
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.93.970802150916.3969K-100000>