Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 02:58:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net> To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Iozone: local vs nfs drives Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.961017025714.16113R-100000@mail.cdsnet.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.95.961017042515.4767A-100000@spirit.ki.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I would be interested in the answer to this, I see the same behaviour on a 2940/Quantum Atlas combo, although the numbers are quite a bit higher. :) In any case, given specifically the issue of news, where most activity is reading, this is disturbing. > vs local drive (1.78M/s and 938k/s): > IOZONE performance measurements: > 1784080 bytes/second for writing the file > 938585 bytes/second for reading the file > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.95.961017025714.16113R-100000>