Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 22:07:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> To: Joshua Oreman <oremanj@www.get-linux.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: current state of the art / best practice for devfs in a jail ? Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030703220654.31430A-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20030703173035.GH86503@webserver.get-linux.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Joshua Oreman wrote: > On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:00:46AM -0700 or thereabouts, Josh Brooks wrote: > > > > I have been researching the various of ways people add devfs to a jail to > > give the jail certian /dev devices necessary to function ... > > Well, all I did was test your research :-) Gordon Tetlow (victim CC'd) was, I believe, working on changes to rc.d to allow automatic construction of jails at boot, and part of that was some best practice devfs rules for jail. Perhaps he could chime in now? :-) Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Network Associates Laboratories
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030703220654.31430A-100000>