Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 3 Jul 2003 22:07:57 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
To:        Joshua Oreman <oremanj@www.get-linux.org>
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: current state of the art / best practice for devfs in a jail ?
Message-ID:  <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030703220654.31430A-100000@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030703173035.GH86503@webserver.get-linux.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Joshua Oreman wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:00:46AM -0700 or thereabouts, Josh Brooks wrote:
> > 
> > I have been researching the various of ways people add devfs to a jail to
> > give the jail certian /dev devices necessary to function ...
> 
> Well, all I did was test your research :-)

Gordon Tetlow (victim CC'd) was, I believe, working on changes to rc.d to
allow automatic construction of jails at boot, and part of that was some
best practice devfs rules for jail.  Perhaps he could chime in now? :-)

Robert N M Watson             FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
robert@fledge.watson.org      Network Associates Laboratories



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030703220654.31430A-100000>