Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:37:24 -0500 (EST) From: Todd Vierling <tv@duh.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: FUD about CGD and GBDE Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.62.0503031436160.12890@server.duh.org> In-Reply-To: <10479.1109877918@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <10479.1109877918@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > At the time where I wrote GBDE, the best that was offered was CGD (and > similar) and users (not cryptographers!) didn't trust it Could you back up this claim, insofar that "users" did not trust cgd? I haven't seen any distrust of cgd -- in fact, I've seen quite a bit of welcome acceptace of cgd by both users *and* cryptographers. -- -- Todd Vierling <tv@duh.org> <tv@pobox.com>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.4.62.0503031436160.12890>