Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Feb 2006 23:45:33 +0100 (CET)
From:      Sten Spans <sten@blinkenlights.nl>
To:        "V. T. Mueller" <freebsd-amd64@datafarm.de>
Cc:        freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: AMD 64 stability
Message-ID:  <Pine.SOC.4.61.0602232343410.13647@tea.blinkenlights.nl>
In-Reply-To: <43FE094A.8030302@datafarm.de>
References:  <43FCEF9C.5050308@bluelight.org.uk> <20060223113840.78b0a1c2.kgunders@teamcool.net> <43FE048F.7030702@datafarm.de> <200602231550.48331.joao@matik.com.br> <43FE094A.8030302@datafarm.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, V. T. Mueller wrote:

>
> I was relating to "server usage", as stated in the first sentence of my 
> original email - which you decided not to quote.
>
> Of course the A8V is no server board. So the limitations by design will 
> prevent a couple of pitfalls that were otherwise possible. If the original 
> poster is going to buy a server board/system, he should carefully collect 
> information regarding the whole environment he is about to set up.
>
> Besides, you should take a look on the compatibilty list again, counting the 
> number of server boards with chipsets that can address up to 32 GB of RAM ;)

Opterons don't use chipsets to access main memory ...
The motherbord just needs enough slots and good
enough traces to support a fully populated memory bus.

-- 
Sten Spans

"There is a crack in everything, that's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen - Anthem



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOC.4.61.0602232343410.13647>