Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 13:58:38 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jason C. Wells" <jcwells@nwlink.com> To: Kenneth Karoliussen <kenneth@karoliussen.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, odin <nc@collector.org> Subject: Re: Aliased network interface Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.1000725135240.20240D-100000@utah> In-Reply-To: <076401bff646$2f682040$1a85bcd5@kekar.dhs.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Kenneth Karoliussen wrote: > Are there any methods for creating a *true* alias network interfaces? > I'm not talking about attached alias IP addresses to a single interface.. True? I have only used Redhat and FreeBSD. Based on that alone, alias _is_ attaching an alias IP address to a single interface. > I really want this because I need a method for speaking with multiple > source IP address to foreign hosts, by create multiple entries in the > routing table. I know this was possible on a Linux based system by > creating aliased interfaces like eth0 -> eth0:1, eth0:2 and attach > different IP addressed to the alias interfaces. > > PC1 (with one psyical NIS (eth0)) > 192.168.1.1 <---eth0---> Net A > 192.168.1.2 <---eth0:1(alias)---> Net B > 193.168.1.3 <---eth0:2(alias)---> Host A FreeBSD does not have the eth0:0 semantics. Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire 192.168.1 link#1 UC fxp0 => 192.168.1.200/32 link#1 UC fxp0 => These two entries are for the same interface. There are multiple entries in the routing table. The difference is the cosmetics of the display. That or I am smoking crack. Thank you, Jason C. Wells To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.3.96.1000725135240.20240D-100000>