Date: Fri, 24 Jul 1998 12:10:47 -0500 (CDT) From: steven wesley wilson <swwilso1@students.uiuc.edu> To: Chris Dillon <cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us> Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Supported Hardware in FreeBSD Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.980724120819.8830A-100000@ux7.cso.uiuc.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980724112615.8714C-100000@duey.hs.wolves.k12.mo.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks for responding, I'm interested in the Celeron because it is a cheap alternative. I realize it has not L2 cache, but through overclocking I understand you can drive the processer at close to p2 350 performance. If this is the case(I know people who are doing it), I thought I'ld save a few bucks. Any thoughts. > Anyway, is there any particlar reason you want a Celeron processor? > Those have no L2 cache, and performance can suffer badly. The Celeron > was meant to be bought by people who had no idea what it was missing. Steve Wilson swwilso1@uiuc.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.3.96.980724120819.8830A-100000>