Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 15 Mar 1999 13:09:53 -0800 (PST)
From:      "Richard J. Dawes" <rjdawes@physics.ucsd.edu>
To:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   An Idea [was "What do people think of May 1st for a 3.2 release date?"]
Message-ID:  <Pine.SOL.3.96.990315114717.16819D-100000@huntington>
In-Reply-To: <199903151103.AA17270@waltz.rahul.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, all!
	I'm pretty new to this list and keep mostly quiet, especially
since I'm still a student and most issues go over my head.  But, I have
an idea regarding the timing of releases and the work being done on
freebsd-stable.  [No groans, yet, please! ;-) ]  I've amended the
subject of this so that the original 'thread' isn't muddled.
	First, keep the longer release interval in place, whatever you
all think that should be (6 mos., a year, whatever).  Then, simply
designate on a regular basis (monthly, bimonthly, whatever) some source-
snap to be an entirely unofficial subrelease (is "point-release" the
lingo?).  It should probably be a couple weeks old at least, one that
seems to have the best combo. of bug fixes vs. new bugs caused by them.
This could be decided by Jordan, consensus on this list, whatever.
Since it is not an official release such a decision can be made entirely
unscientifically; gut feeling is entirely reasonable in this scheme.  If
in some month things are just so weird that this is just impractical,
then this can be noted in a short README next to the snap directories
(which in any case could be a clearinghouse for suggestions to handle
as-yet unresolved problems).
	This way, the regular development cycle can be preserved.
Dummies (like me ;-), though, would have a means for being quite reason-
ably sure that such "stable-snap" source would build into a more stable
system then what the last CD provides, and yet not have to follow the
day-to-day developments with freebsd-stable.  Sysadmins, who should of
course still follow the regular track, could with minimal effort keep
their systems more up-to-date without testing things out on a standalone
system first. 
	Well, what do you all think?  [OK, you can groan now ;-) ]
Please be gentle, though, since I'm still a green newbie here.  Oh, and
yes, Mike, I'll help out in whatever feeble way I can! ;-)

--Rich


========================================
Richard J. Dawes	rdawes@ucsd.edu
========================================




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SOL.3.96.990315114717.16819D-100000>