Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 12:37:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Cedric Berger <cedric@wireless-networks.com>, Arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KSE threading support (first parts) Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010501122914.5556A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <15086.57554.673831.601763@nomad.yogotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Nate Williams wrote: > > > Sorry is I ask a stupid question, but I'm trying to make sense of this thread. > > > Here is my question: > > > - I've a server that runs a single big java application server (one process, > > > tons of threads like every Java app) > > > - With the new KSE and friends architecture, will I be able to scale > > > my app by adding CPUs? > > > > Using the linuxthreads port you can do that today > > using Pthreads today you can not. > > using the KSE scheme you can > > Only if the JVM is compiled using the above technologies. Linuxthreads > won't be used because the license is incompatible with the JDK license. And when we do get KSEs, what's the optimal way to map Java threads to KSEGs/KSEs? Should each Java thread be a PTHREAD_SCOPE_SYSTEM thread where each thread gets its own KSEG/KSE pair, or would it be better to run all threads as PTHREAD_SCOPE_PROCESS in one KSE/KSEG pair? -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.1010501122914.5556A-100000>