Date: Thu, 23 Mar 1995 12:03:51 -0500 (EST) From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@Glue.umd.edu> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com> Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, me@tartufo.pcs.dec.com, nate@trout.sri.mt.net, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Make World Times and a question about shared libs / make all Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950323120227.11921A-100000@cappuccino.eng.umd.edu> In-Reply-To: <13688.795976394@freefall.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 23 Mar 1995, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > Would people think it gross if /usr/include was nothing but > > a directory tree full of symbolic links into /usr/src (or > > where ever you did the ``make INCLUDE_TYPES=symlink includes'' from). > > No, that would actually be more (he ducks) ORTHOGONAL! :-) > > Seriously. Then you at least have a tree of links or a tree of copies > but never a mix (you may recall me raving on this particular topic > awhile back) and it's at least a whole lot easier to _understand_. > > Yes! Please! > > Jordan > How would that work for folks who don't want to keep an entire source tree available? I have the room, myself, but lots of friends running FreeBSD are doing it in 200-300 meg partitions. Would this hurt them? ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include any kind of voice or data chuckr@eng.umd.edu | communications topic, C programming, and Unix. 7608 Topton St. | New Carrollton, MD 20784 | I run Journey2 (Freebsd 2.0) and n3lxx (301) 459-2316 | (FreeBSD 1.1.5.1) and am I happy! ----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.950323120227.11921A-100000>