Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 17:41:08 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Jeffrey Hsu <hsu@freefall.freebsd.org> Cc: peter@freefall.freebsd.org, lite2@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs tree preperation.. Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.93.960820171522.21724A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <199608191920.MAA02683@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
My vote is for 3:. 4: looks very nice, but I think it's better to have source. Though, I won't complain if 4 is chosen. On Mon, 19 Aug 1996, Jeffrey Hsu wrote: > > 3: like #2, but place explicit markers on the current branch and use those > > for merging > > This is close to what I do locally. > > > 4: Give p3 a shot (http://www.p3.com). > > I'm game if it's okay with everyone else. I've always wanted to try > out p3 and this will force me to do so. > > So, either 3 or 4 is okay with me.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.93.960820171522.21724A-100000>