Date: Thu, 14 Nov 1996 10:17:05 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freefall.freebsd.org> Cc: Mark Mayo <mark@quickweb.com>, Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>, roberto@keltia.freenix.fr, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ufs is too slow? Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.961114101420.17581H-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <199611122025.MAA25041@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I talked to a WinNT products manager at Veritas and this was his reply: ----- The Volume Manager will sit (optionally) under NTFS or FAT or whatever file systems someone is using on NT. It is optional in the sense that people will still use hard disk partitions for data that they may need to access from Win95 should they want/need to boot that OS. VxFS (which you mention in the subject line and later) is not part of the agreement with Microsoft, and is not yet being ported to NT. ----- Regards, Mike Hancock
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.95.961114101420.17581H-100000>