Date: Fri, 7 Feb 1997 10:17:21 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How paranoid is Theo? (was Re: Karl fulminates, film at 11. == , thanks) Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.970207101328.5763A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <E0vsen0-0007NJ-00@rover.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 6 Feb 1997, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <Pine.SV4.3.95.970207094754.5515B-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> Michael Hancock writes: > : With the stuff you've looked at so far does it look like Theo is going > : after each and every buffer overflow possibility or the just the ones that > : can be exploited? > > Mostly just exploitable or likely exploitable ones. > > Warner Cool. You can establish a contract of trust between called functions and calling functions and not waste time fixing things that aren't exploitable. Mike Hancock
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.95.970207101328.5763A-100000>