Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 21:06:16 +0100 (BST) From: "K.J.Koster" <kjk1@ukc.ac.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Suggestion for ports... Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.95.970911205849.22246B-100000@kestrel.ukc.ac.uk>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dear All, I just did my first installation from the `ports' (yes, a british ispell), and it was too easy. I had gone through all the trouble to download ispell, and make completely ignored me and took it straight from the cdrom (how rude :) In one word: Wow! I do have a small suggestion (I haven't tried this, so it may already exist). I noticed that make uses a `work' directory to compile in. How about making it so that if make finds the file system read-only and is unable to create a work directory, it defaults to (for example) `/tmp/<portname>.work'. That way, the casual ports user can do <place live filesys in cdrom drive> mount /cdrom cd /cdrom/ports/textproc/ispell make british install ... cd umount /cdrom No need to place a rather chunky ports distribution on your system. Does the ports collection already do this? Groetjes, Kees Jan ---------------------------------------------------------------v-- Kees Jan Koster tel: UK-1227-453157 e-mail: kjk1@ukc.ac.uk 15 St. Michaels Road, Canterbury, Kent, United Kingdom ------------------------------------------------------------------ from trials come errors... from errors come legends...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.95.970911205849.22246B-100000>