Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 11:05:23 +1300 (New Zealand Daylight Time) From: Juha Saarinen <juha@saarinen.org> To: Gerhard Sittig <Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net> Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" <stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Waaaarg, we just blew out the kernel again.. Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.43.0112191104290.1276-100000@den2> In-Reply-To: <20011218225438.C1494@shell.gsinet.sittig.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Gerhard Sittig wrote: > bzip2 has been around for a while and has been shipped since > 4.4-RELEASE. :) When I see the constant "who put another > three KB into the kernel and thus broke release?" against the > "9KB plus for the loader versus 40KB gain for the kernel" > switching to bzip2 should give some room to breath(sp?). Is there much difference in speed between the compression methods? That is, would bzip2 be an issue on older, low-spec machines? -- Juha Take off every sig! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.WNT.4.43.0112191104290.1276-100000>