Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 10:45:46 +0000 From: Gerard Seibert <carmel_ny@outlook.com> To: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: what to do when base openssl isn't suitable Message-ID: <SN2PR20MB0845FCF7FFB0B94255384D5E80260@SN2PR20MB0845.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <201607020225.u622Pfbc094491@gw.catspoiler.org> References: <y45l-szjl-wny@vfemail.net> <201607020225.u622Pfbc094491@gw.catspoiler.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have to admit that this whole discussion has gotten me confused. I use "openssl" from ports, always have and probably always will. I use to use the now apparently depreciate statement in the /etc/make.conf file: WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=3DYES >From what I am reading, I would replace that line with the following statement: DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3D ssl=3Dopenssl to force the use of the "ports" version of "openssl". Is that correct, or is my interpretation of this incorrect? Thanks --=20 Carmel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?SN2PR20MB0845FCF7FFB0B94255384D5E80260>