Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 23 Feb 2019 10:28:24 +0000
From:      "Scheffenegger, Richard" <Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com>
To:        Michael Tuexen <tuexen@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-transport@freebsd.org" <freebsd-transport@freebsd.org>
Subject:   RE: DSACK
Message-ID:  <SN4PR0601MB3728DDE5402768567DA9415F86780@SN4PR0601MB3728.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <5ACAD39A-2A77-43BB-BE93-994C1C6C93AB@freebsd.org>
References:  <SN4PR0601MB3728752D55B7231BC4CF22B586780@SN4PR0601MB3728.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <5ACAD39A-2A77-43BB-BE93-994C1C6C93AB@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Bin grad am flughafen und hab leider nur HEAD bei mir (und ein iso von 10, =
wo ich grad versuch, das mit scapy zu checken).

Falls du schnell einen packetdrill gegen BSD11 ohne D18960 machen kannst, u=
nd es da noch DSACKs raussendet, w=E4re das toll!

Ich f=FCrchte aber, das das schon l=E4ngere Zeit kaputt ist - da wir nun do=
ch noch nicht D18960 drinnen haben, wie ich irrt=FCmlich dachte.



-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Tuexen <tuexen@freebsd.org>=20
Sent: Samstag, 23. Februar 2019 11:25
To: Scheffenegger, Richard <Richard.Scheffenegger@netapp.com>
Cc: freebsd-transport@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: DSACK

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or o=
pen attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is saf=
e.




> On 23. Feb 2019, at 10:29, Scheffenegger, Richard <Richard.Scheffenegger@=
netapp.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> A colleague pointed me to the stack (HEAD) no longer emitting DSACK optio=
ns a few days ago...
>
> I was under the impression, that older versions of FreeBSD would send out=
 DSACKs for spurious duplicate packets.
>
> But when I try this script against HEAD, regular cumulative ACKs without =
DSACK blocks are showing up.
>
> Currently bandwidth starved - but was that a conscious decision? Or was m=
e observing DSACKs never a thing?
I would say if it is working in stable/11, but not in stable/12 and head, i=
t is a regression.

Best regards
Michael
>
> Thanks a lot,
>   Richard
>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?SN4PR0601MB3728DDE5402768567DA9415F86780>